🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.4/5 from 582+ reviews
Womenβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Lane Bryant Wide leg jeans size 24

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.4 out of 5(582 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$12.35
$20.58
Sale
βœ“ gratis delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

High rise, wide leg jeans.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift shipment
↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Lane Bryant Wide leg jeans size 24

High rise, wide leg jeans.

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Women products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 2404888

Category: Women > Jeans > Wide-Leg

Original Price:$20.58 USD

Sale Price:$12.35 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand brand-new

🚚 dispatch & Returns

βœ“ gratis fulfillment on orders over $50

Standard fulfillment: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.4
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 3403 reviews
DA
David Anderson βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Honolulu, HI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
leading purchase ever
really good value Lane Bryant Wide leg jeans size 24.
39 people found this helpful
JM
Jessica Moore βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 week ago Β· San Jose, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
top Lane Bryant Wide leg jeans size 24 ever
Good value and quality Lane Bryant Wide leg jeans size 24.
8 people found this helpful
HP​
Heather Perez βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Philadelphia, PA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
terrific investment
the Lane Bryant Wide leg jeans size 24 is uncomplicated to use and I’m satisfied.
41 people found this helpful
SA
Samantha Adams βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 weeks ago Β· Los Angeles, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
So happy with this
After some use, the Lane Bryant Wide leg jeans size 24 does its job and it’s fine overall. dispatch was normal.
42 people found this helpful
MR
Mike Reynolds βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Nashville, TN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
terrific investment
After a few days, the Lane Bryant Wide leg jeans size 24 is practical which is good enough.
46 people found this helpful